Lecture
PDF:- 2015 - The Effects of Sexualized Female Characters in Superhero Films on Women
- Group Norm Theory ^85b107
- What are the 2 problems in traditional prejudice study?
- Studying one prejudice at a time
- To really understand prejudice, should look at prejudice toward many group
- Decrease in expressed prejudice: read or just conforming to norms?
- There are multiple explanations for decrease expression in prejudice: change in attitude or internalization of prevailing social norm OR conformity without internalization
- Charlesworth & Banaji (2019)
- Studying one prejudice at a time
- What new perspective did group norm theory propose?
- Socialization processes:
my group believes = my belief - Attitude toward other group
- Contact with the attitudes toward these groups prevailing among the older members of the groups in which they develop
- Changing group norms will be easier and possibly more effective than changing individual attitudes
- Socialization processes:
- What are some common “norms” that increase prejudice acceptability? ^a649ef
- People are less acceptable for people who have done ”bad” actions
- People are less acceptable for people who is high on competence and low on warmth (disgust)
- People are less acceptable for people who does not confront norm
- What are some implication for prejudice acceptability?
-
Its ok to discriminate(hold prejudice) known the unacceptability/break of social norm
- The public expression toward groups is highly correlated with social approval of that expression
- Expressing prejudice
- Evaluating scenarios of discrimination
- Reacting to hostile jokes
- The more desirable (i.e., valued) the group, the more people will wish to follow its lead
- Need to Belong: higher motivation to belong, higher possibility to change
- When people identify with valued groups that condemn a prejudice, they are likely to work to internalize those attitudes and reduce that prejudice
- To change prejudice, change norms within valued groups
-
- What are the 2 problems in traditional prejudice study?
- Social structure and media
- Interpersonal vs. Structure prejudice
- Racism in contemporary society an interpersonal phenomenon that originates from prejudiced individuals OR a structural phenomenon that originates in policies or laws that systematically disadvantage members of marginalized racial groups?\
- What is the hierarchy-preserving homeostasis
- Some actors embedded within the larger system (e.g., prosecutors) maintain hierarchy, whereas others (e.g., public defenders) attenuate hierarchy
- People are assumed guilty by default, (powerful ones always have upper hand)
- The system disproportionally favours the hierarchy maintainer
- How to assess structure bias
- Examine the outcome
- Ex. disproportion imprisonment rate for black
- What are some consequences for ignoring structure influences
-
- ★ Read this paper carefully
- Factor contribute to such ignorance
- Critical education
- Socialization
- Direct/vicarious racism experiences
- System threats
- Identity-based threats
- Egalitarian motives
-
- Interpersonal vs. Structure prejudice
Active Studying
Summarize today’s lecture
- [::Most important/focused topic]
- [::Most difficult part, why, how to resolve]