Lecture

  • PDF:
  • 2015 - The Effects of Sexualized Female Characters in Superhero Films on Women
  • Group Norm Theory ^85b107
    • What are the 2 problems in traditional prejudice study?
      1. Studying one prejudice at a time
        • To really understand prejudice, should look at prejudice toward many group
      2. Decrease in expressed prejudice: read or just conforming to norms?
        • There are multiple explanations for decrease expression in prejudice: change in attitude or internalization of prevailing social norm OR conformity without internalization
        • Charlesworth & Banaji (2019)
    • What new perspective did group norm theory propose?
      • Socialization processes: my group believes = my belief
      • Attitude toward other group
        • Contact with the attitudes toward these groups prevailing among the older members of the groups in which they develop
      • Changing group norms will be easier and possibly more effective than changing individual attitudes
    • What are some common “norms” that increase prejudice acceptability? ^a649ef
      • People are less acceptable for people who have donebad” actions
      • People are less acceptable for people who is high on competence and low on warmth (disgust)
      • People are less acceptable for people who does not confront norm
    • What are some implication for prejudice acceptability?
      • Its ok to discriminate(hold prejudice) known the unacceptability/break of social norm

      • The public expression toward groups is highly correlated with social approval of that expression
        • Expressing prejudice
        • Evaluating scenarios of discrimination
        • Reacting to hostile jokes
      • The more desirable (i.e., valued) the group, the more people will wish to follow its lead
        • Need to Belong: higher motivation to belong, higher possibility to change
      • When people identify with valued groups that condemn a prejudice, they are likely to work to internalize those attitudes and reduce that prejudice
      • To change prejudice, change norms within valued groups
  • Social structure and media
    • Interpersonal vs. Structure prejudice
      • Racism in contemporary society an interpersonal phenomenon that originates from prejudiced individuals OR a structural phenomenon that originates in policies or laws that systematically disadvantage members of marginalized racial groups?\
    • What is the hierarchy-preserving homeostasis
      • Some actors embedded within the larger system (e.g., prosecutors) maintain hierarchy, whereas others (e.g., public defenders) attenuate hierarchy
      • People are assumed guilty by default, (powerful ones always have upper hand)
      • The system disproportionally favours the hierarchy maintainer
    • How to assess structure bias
      • Examine the outcome
      • Ex. disproportion imprisonment rate for black
    • What are some consequences for ignoring structure influences
      • ★ Read this paper carefully
      • Factor contribute to such ignorance
        • Critical education
        • Socialization
        • Direct/vicarious racism experiences
        • System threats
        • Identity-based threats
        • Egalitarian motives

Active Studying

Summarize today’s lecture

  • [::Most important/focused topic]
  • [::Most difficult part, why, how to resolve]

What part I didn’t understand, next step actions?