Groups
Influence on the individual
Group
- A collection of individuals that are interdependent to each other in some degree
- A collection of individuals who perceive some level of entitativity (a group considers themselves to be a entity with unity and coherence)
- Ultrasociality - a collective organization with full division of labour
- 1000 (or more) individuals living together
- In all other ultrasocial species, most individuals are cloesly related (genetically)
- Groups are an adaptation that enables humans to be ultrasociality
- Advantage of group living (evolution + psychological)
- Protection from predators
- Easier to obtain resources
- Assistance in child rearing
- Defense against other groups
- Also fulfills the psychological need to belong
- Disadvantage of group living
- Intergroup competition and status differentials can emerge
- Dominant and dominated groups can emerge (race, socioeconomic status)
- Intergroup bias (stereotyping, prejudice, discrimination)
Zajonc’s Model (social facilitation) ★
Answers: do we behave better when others are present
Others presence => Arousal => Strengthens dominant responses
- Dominant response is correct (enhance easy behavior)
- Dominant response is incorrect (impairing difficult behavior)
- This implies that when there are mere presence of others, people do better or simple or well-learned tasks, and worse for difficult or novel tasks
Related Study
The cockroach study
Other aspect of social facilitation
- Evaluation Apprehension - concern about looking bad in eyes of others (sense of Social Comparison Theory)
- Social loafing - the tendency to exert less effort when working on a group where individual contributions cannot not be monitored
- Deindividuation - the reduced sense of individual identity ans self control that occurs in large groups (impulsivity, irrationality, emotionality, antisociality)
- Individuation - enhanced individual identity produced by focusing attention of the self
- Spotlight effect - conviction that other people are paying attention to them more than they actually are
Group decision-making
Group Think
- Conditions to make group think worse:
- High cohesiveness, Insulation, Lack of procedures for search and appraisal of information, High stress, strong leaders
- Emotional factor is dominant
- Symptoms
- Illusion invulnerability/moral superiority, Pressure on dissenters/self-censorship, Collective rationalization< Stereotypes out-groups,Illusion of unanimity
- Effects
- Poor information search
- Shallow examination of information
- Narrow consideration of alternatives
- Bias in processing information
- Failure to work out contingencies
- Preventing
- Leader refrains from making opinions known
- Introduce people into the group at different stages
- Designate a devil’s advocate
- Summarize: group decision making sometimes can be bad
- Connected to the thesis of the book: 乌合之众
Polarization
- Group Polarization - tendency for group decision to be more extreme than those made by individual
- Connected to the thesis of the book: 乌合之众
Group organization
Leadership types
- Almost all groups have hierarchies (leader would likely to emerge)
- Characteristics of leader
- Relevant skills
- Good social skills
- Altruistic
- Different types of ways for leader to emerge
- Authority - power drives from institutionalized roles
- Dominance - behavior enacted with the goal acquiring or demonstrating power
- Status - evaluation by others (been respected, and have prominence)
- Power - ability to control one’s own outcomes and those of others
Danger of power
-
Power vs Status
- Low status and high power can be threatening and aversive
- High status and low power can result n people acting o their internal states and feelings
-
Approach/inhibition Theory
- High-power people inclined to go after their goals and make quick (sometimes rash) judgments (approach)
- Lower-power inclined to constrain their behavior & pay careful attention to others (inhibition)
-
Alternative idea: power makes people more like who they really are
Cultural
Human Capacity for culture
- Cultural Psychology - The study of psychology and behavior are influenced by culture
Cultural dimensions
Hofsted's IBM Study
- Power distance - extend to which power and status differences are accepted and sanctioned in society
- Uncertainty Avoidance - extend to which uncertainly and ambiguity are tolerated
- Masculinity/Femininity - extend to which traditional masculine values, like aggressiveness and assertiveness are valued
- individualist cultures/collectivistic cultures - extend to which the self or the Group and Culture constitutes the center point of identification for the individual
- Criticism
- Single company’s data (strong corporate culture, western company)
- There are other dimensions
- Partial geographic coverage
- Measures are attitudinal not behavior
Bicultural People
Naive Dialecicism
- Principle of change - reality is not static but in process of constant change
- Principle few contradiction - reality is not precise and clear, but is full of contradictions
- Principle of Context (or holism) - parts are meaningful only in their relations