Groups

Influence on the individual

Group

  • A collection of individuals that are interdependent to each other in some degree
  • A collection of individuals who perceive some level of entitativity (a group considers themselves to be a entity with unity and coherence)

  • Ultrasociality - a collective organization with full division of labour
    • 1000 (or more) individuals living together
    • In all other ultrasocial species, most individuals are cloesly related (genetically)
    • Groups are an adaptation that enables humans to be ultrasociality
  • Advantage of group living (evolution + psychological)
    1. Protection from predators
    2. Easier to obtain resources
    3. Assistance in child rearing
    4. Defense against other groups
  • Disadvantage of group living
    • Intergroup competition and status differentials can emerge
    • Dominant and dominated groups can emerge (race, socioeconomic status)
    • Intergroup bias (stereotyping, prejudice, discrimination)

Zajonc’s Model (social facilitation) ★

Answers: do we behave better when others are present

Others presence => Arousal => Strengthens dominant responses

  • Dominant response is correct (enhance easy behavior)
  • Dominant response is incorrect (impairing difficult behavior)
  • This implies that when there are mere presence of others, people do better or simple or well-learned tasks, and worse for difficult or novel tasks
  • Related Study The cockroach study

Other aspect of social facilitation

  • Evaluation Apprehension - concern about looking bad in eyes of others (sense of Social Comparison Theory)
  • Social loafing - the tendency to exert less effort when working on a group where individual contributions cannot not be monitored
  • Deindividuation - the reduced sense of individual identity ans self control that occurs in large groups (impulsivity, irrationality, emotionality, antisociality)
    • Individuation - enhanced individual identity produced by focusing attention of the self
  • Spotlight effect - conviction that other people are paying attention to them more than they actually are

Group decision-making

Group Think

  • Conditions to make group think worse:
    • High cohesiveness, Insulation, Lack of procedures for search and appraisal of information, High stress, strong leaders
    • Emotional factor is dominant
  • Symptoms
    • Illusion invulnerability/moral superiority, Pressure on dissenters/self-censorship, Collective rationalization< Stereotypes out-groups,Illusion of unanimity
  • Effects
    • Poor information search
    • Shallow examination of information
    • Narrow consideration of alternatives
    • Bias in processing information
    • Failure to work out contingencies
  • Preventing
    • Leader refrains from making opinions known
    • Introduce people into the group at different stages
    • Designate a devil’s advocate
  • Summarize: group decision making sometimes can be bad
  • Connected to the thesis of the book: 乌合之众

Polarization

  • Group Polarization - tendency for group decision to be more extreme than those made by individual
  • Connected to the thesis of the book: 乌合之众

Group organization

Leadership types

  • Almost all groups have hierarchies (leader would likely to emerge)
  • Characteristics of leader
    • Relevant skills
    • Good social skills
    • Altruistic
  • Different types of ways for leader to emerge
    • Authority - power drives from institutionalized roles
    • Dominance - behavior enacted with the goal acquiring or demonstrating power
    • Status - evaluation by others (been respected, and have prominence)
    • Power - ability to control one’s own outcomes and those of others

Danger of power

  • Power vs Status

    • Low status and high power can be threatening and aversive
    • High status and low power can result n people acting o their internal states and feelings
  • Approach/inhibition Theory

    • High-power people inclined to go after their goals and make quick (sometimes rash) judgments (approach)
    • Lower-power inclined to constrain their behavior & pay careful attention to others (inhibition)
  • Alternative idea: power makes people more like who they really are

Cultural

Human Capacity for culture

Cultural dimensions

Hofsted's IBM Study

  1. Power distance - extend to which power and status differences are accepted and sanctioned in society
  2. Uncertainty Avoidance - extend to which uncertainly and ambiguity are tolerated
  3. Masculinity/Femininity - extend to which traditional masculine values, like aggressiveness and assertiveness are valued
  4. individualist cultures/collectivistic cultures - extend to which the self or the Group and Culture constitutes the center point of identification for the individual
  • Criticism
    • Single company’s data (strong corporate culture, western company)
    • There are other dimensions
    • Partial geographic coverage
    • Measures are attitudinal not behavior

Bicultural People

Picture here

Naive Dialecicism

  1. Principle of change - reality is not static but in process of constant change
  2. Principle few contradiction - reality is not precise and clear, but is full of contradictions
  3. Principle of Context (or holism) - parts are meaningful only in their relations

Many types of cultures