Signifying Reality
Dive under the surface, and ask question about the “obvious”
Readings
- All languages appear to have nouns and verbs
- Humans are programmed to easily process certain kind of language rules
- Need not be spoken
- Its independent of the way we express it
- Language need not to be communicated (internal speech)
- Reflects the way we speak with others
- Other understanding of the world is aided by both the internal speech & social understanding
- Linguistic and semiotic anthropology are disciplines that study the role of signs in human cultural and society
How signs represent our world (semiotics)
-
Human’s reality is constructed by our use of signs
-
Signification(verb) - making sense, making signs
- Linguistic and non-linguistic signs
-
Homo sapiens - “human that knows” (making sense == to signify)
-
Semiotics - study of signs (signifiying)
- Linguistics - study of language (part of semiotics)
- Other signs (semiotics proper)
The form fo signs (signifier and the signified)
- Classic (”Saussurean”) View of Signification (Ferdinand de Saussure)
- Signifier - has some physical property(audio, visual, writing)
- Signified - in material (not in semiotic language, ordinary language)
Sign = Signifier + Signified (3 quality of signs, a sign can have more than one qualities)
-
==Icon== - share some of their physical form (shape, sound…
Ex. Picture of a person -> person
-
==Index== - do not share any of their form(sound/look) with the referent - has existential relationships with its referent
Ex. Moose poo -> Moose
Ex. “Smoke” and “Fire” is neither arbitrary(pure convention) nor iconic (has no image)
-
==Symbol== - have arbitrary relation to signified (referent) - no existential relationship [暗喻]
Ex. Cross -> signifies England
-
Connected only via systems of signification (eg. Language)
-
Arbitrary is opposite of motivated(icons & index is motivated)
-
Most words are arbitrary
-
Index has existential relationship while symbols don’t
-
Differentiating between it
Would you get the meaning without learning the a code or a language? (No -> symbol)
Can you say in ordinary talk that the sign is what it stands for? (Yes -> Icon)
The sign indicates but isn’t what it stands for (Index)
Denotation and Connotation
- Denotation - what a sign (including linguistics signs like words) means literally
- Connotation - what it means not literally, what it implies
- Linguistic sign is a type fo connotation (eg. Word, phrase, sentence)
- Connotations vary more from person to person than denotation
- Connotations are powerful but not easily open to argument
- “What cannot be said is greater than what can be saide”
Reality and The Real
- ==Reality - how we understand The Real (in social science jargon) - we are well advised to live in it==
- Reality is socially constructed - Its what’s verifiable and makes sense to us
- Constructed by society (most reality come acres through the finer of signs and language)
- The concept might be very real, but could be false
- Reality vs irreality (truth from lies / falsehood / false news)
- Reality is socially constructed - Its what’s verifiable and makes sense to us
Colour as social construct
- Green and blue has no distinction in old Chinese and English
- The colour spectrum is continuous, it’s language that divides it into units
Alternate Realities
- Content creators could manipulate “reality” with what they were presenting
Whorf Hypothesis
- Benjamin Lee Whorf (not possible to prove it)
- Each language decisively influences the way its speaker think (different language construct different realities) - linguistic relativity
Ex. Pasted tense represents cultural’s view of time
Self as construct
- Theory: Our concept of having a self (ego) is not entirely given by nature
- Constructed in society, by sings, especially language
- There is a continuum our of which language delineates a distinguiable “self”
- Experiences and actions are united in the one distinct whole we call “I”
Jacques Lacan reinterpreted Freud stages of the development of self
-
Real -> Imaginary (mirror stage) -> Symbolic (accomplished through languages)
-
Real (ego not yet formed) - the real is undifferentiated, no signs, uncategorized experience
- No boundary between self and the world (does not know where she begins and ends)
-
Imaginary (ego forms) - world is perceived without words, ego image is supported by society
- Corresponds to the icon (image rather than words, icon is the most typical image sign)
- Image vs. The word
-
Symbolic (language appears) - the world is differentiated into categories marked by signifiers
- Gets a system that has thousands and categories that separates the reality
- Ego learns to understand “I” as part of a society, in relation to “you”
- Characteristics (systematic, socially constructed and sanctioned(approved), not given by nature, is not THE REAL, but its the reality)
-
We are both “I” and “you” to ourselves
- One party coaches the other, it represents society