Signifying Reality

Dive under the surface, and ask question about the “obvious”

Readings

  • All languages appear to have nouns and verbs
  • Humans are programmed to easily process certain kind of language rules
    • Need not be spoken
    • Its independent of the way we express it
  • Language need not to be communicated (internal speech)
    • Reflects the way we speak with others
    • Other understanding of the world is aided by both the internal speech & social understanding
  • Linguistic and semiotic anthropology are disciplines that study the role of signs in human cultural and society

How signs represent our world (semiotics)

  • Human’s reality is constructed by our use of signs

  • Signification(verb) - making sense, making signs

    • Linguistic and non-linguistic signs
  • Homo sapiens - “human that knows” (making sense == to signify)

  • Semiotics - study of signs (signifiying)

    • Linguistics - study of language (part of semiotics)
    • Other signs (semiotics proper)

The form fo signs (signifier and the signified)

  • Classic (”Saussurean”) View of Signification (Ferdinand de Saussure)
    • Signifier - has some physical property(audio, visual, writing)
    • Signified - in material (not in semiotic language, ordinary language)

Sign = Signifier + Signified (3 quality of signs, a sign can have more than one qualities)

  • ==Icon== - share some of their physical form (shape, sound…

    Ex. Picture of a person -> person

  • ==Index== - do not share any of their form(sound/look) with the referent - has existential relationships with its referent

    Ex. Moose poo -> Moose

    Ex. “Smoke” and “Fire” is neither arbitrary(pure convention) nor iconic (has no image)

  • ==Symbol== - have arbitrary relation to signified (referent) - no existential relationship [暗喻]

    Ex. Cross -> signifies England

    • Connected only via systems of signification (eg. Language)

    • Arbitrary is opposite of motivated(icons & index is motivated)

    • Most words are arbitrary

    • Index has existential relationship while symbols don’t

Differentiating between it
  • Would you get the meaning without learning the a code or a language? (No -> symbol)

  • Can you say in ordinary talk that the sign is what it stands for? (Yes -> Icon)

  • The sign indicates but isn’t what it stands for (Index)

Denotation and Connotation

  • Denotation - what a sign (including linguistics signs like words) means literally
  • Connotation - what it means not literally, what it implies
    • Linguistic sign is a type fo connotation (eg. Word, phrase, sentence)
    • Connotations vary more from person to person than denotation
    • Connotations are powerful but not easily open to argument
    • “What cannot be said is greater than what can be saide”

Reality and The Real

  • ==Reality - how we understand The Real (in social science jargon) - we are well advised to live in it==
    • Reality is socially constructed - Its what’s verifiable and makes sense to us
      • Constructed by society (most reality come acres through the finer of signs and language)
    • The concept might be very real, but could be false
    • Reality vs irreality (truth from lies / falsehood / false news)
Colour as social construct
  • Green and blue has no distinction in old Chinese and English
  • The colour spectrum is continuous, it’s language that divides it into units
Alternate Realities
  • Content creators could manipulate “reality” with what they were presenting

Whorf Hypothesis

  • Benjamin Lee Whorf (not possible to prove it)
  • Each language decisively influences the way its speaker think (different language construct different realities) - linguistic relativity

Ex. Pasted tense represents cultural’s view of time

Self as construct

  • Theory: Our concept of having a self (ego) is not entirely given by nature
    • Constructed in society, by sings, especially language
    • There is a continuum our of which language delineates a distinguiable “self”
    • Experiences and actions are united in the one distinct whole we call “I”

Jacques Lacan reinterpreted Freud stages of the development of self

  • Real -> Imaginary (mirror stage) -> Symbolic (accomplished through languages)

  • Real (ego not yet formed) - the real is undifferentiated, no signs, uncategorized experience

    • No boundary between self and the world (does not know where she begins and ends)
  • Imaginary (ego forms) - world is perceived without words, ego image is supported by society

    • Corresponds to the icon (image rather than words, icon is the most typical image sign)
    • Image vs. The word
  • Symbolic (language appears) - the world is differentiated into categories marked by signifiers

    • Gets a system that has thousands and categories that separates the reality
    • Ego learns to understand “I” as part of a society, in relation to “you”
    • Characteristics (systematic, socially constructed and sanctioned(approved), not given by nature, is not THE REAL, but its the reality)
  • We are both “I” and “you” to ourselves

    • One party coaches the other, it represents society